Law Review at Washington University in St. LouisLaw Review at Washington University in St. LouisLaw Review at Washington University in St. LouisLaw Review at Washington University in St. Louis
  • Home
  • Print
  • Online
  • Submissions 
    • Articles
    • Commentaries
    • Notes
  • Symposia 
    • Past Symposia
  • About 
    • Masthead
    • Membership
  • Contact 
    • Subscriptions

Issue 1

  1. Volume 96
  2. Issue 1
Issue
123456
Article

Balancing the Conspiracy’s Books: Inter-Competitor Sales and Price-Fixing Cartels

Christopher R. Leslie
Price fixing is antithetical to a free-market economy. Competitive markets supply goods and services to consumers at the lowest efficient prices. Unfortunately, many businesses would prefer not to compete because they can increase their profits by conspiring to raise price. By refraining from competition, each firm in a price-fixing cartel can maximize its profits at the expense of its customers. Price-fixing conspiracies injure consumers by reducing output below the efficient…
Article

Law and the Epistemology of Disagreements

Alex Stein
This Article identifies a discrepancy between law and epistemology and proposes a way to fix it. Our legal system relies on decisions of multimember tribunals, which include juries, state and federal appellate courts, and supreme courts. Members of those tribunals often disagree with each other on matters of fact. The system settles such disagreement by applying head-counting rules: the unanimity or supermajority requirement for jury verdicts and the majority rule…
Article

Evolved Standards, Evolving Justices? The Case for a Broader Application of the Eighth Amendment

William W. Berry III
In its Eighth Amendment cases, the Supreme Court has often cited counter-majoritarian considerations as the basis for exercising judicial restraint. As a result, excessive and draconian punishments persist in the United States, with the Court being hesitant to use the Constitution to bar state punishment practices. The Court’s evolving standards of decency doctrine, however, is majoritarian. As this Article argues, the doctrinal framework of the Court alleviates the counter-majoritarian difficulty,…
Note

Mahr Provisions and the Case for Shari’a Arbitration

Cora Allen
The global Muslim population is currently estimated at 1.8 billion people, comprising twenty-four percent of the total global population. The United States alone is home to 3.45 million Muslim individuals. Further, both global and national Muslim populations are predicted to grow rapidly over the next half-century. The Pew Research Foundation predicts that between 2015 and 2060, the global Muslim population will grow over twice as fast as the overall world…
Note

No Pay for Sexist Performance: How Gender Disparities in Healthcare Hurt Hospitals’ Pay for Performance Reimbursements

Emily C. Bartlett
Gender disparities and discrimination in healthcare treatment are vast. Women in pain are deemed hysterical, heart attacks in women are caught less frequently than in men due to symptom presentation differences, and women are screened less often than men for some cancers. Meanwhile, in order to be fully reimbursed for healthcare services, legislative reforms increasingly evaluate hospitals and physicians based on their performance as it relates to quality measurements, otherwise…
WashU Law Review Logo Rev 1c

Campus Box 1120, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130

Editor ResourcesBylawsTerms of UsePrivacy Policy
WashU Logo Rev 1c

Copyright 2018 © All Rights Reserved

WU HomeMaps & DirectionsSearch WUWU PoliciesEmerg. Info